ESCHATOLOGICAL AND SECULAR TIME IN POLITICS: RUSSIA, THE WEST, AND CHRONOPOLITICAL INCOMMENSURABILITY

Authors

  • PhD, Leons Gabriels Taivans University of Latvia, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol34.740

Keywords:

temporal plurality, clash of times, chronopolitical understanding, Messianic temporalities

Abstract

The conflict between Russia and the West is not only a clash of interests or values but a clash of times. Western diplomacy privileges secular-linear temporality, while Russia gives preference to eschatological continuity. Unless this chronopolitical incommensurability is recognized, diplomatic engagement will continue to falter.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dostoevsky, F. (1994). A Writer’s Diary. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hosking, G. (1997). Russia: People and Empire, 1552–1917. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ikenberry, J. G. (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kantorowicz, E. H. (1997). The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kirill, Patriarch of Moscow (2013). Speech at the Council of Bishops, February. Available: https://old.mospat.ru/en/2013/02/03/news80422/ (viewed 03.01.2026).

Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kotkin, S. (1995). Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Krahn, C. (1963). Russia: Messianism-Marxism. Journal of Bible and Religion, No. 31 (3), pp. 210–215.

Laruelle, M. (2018). Russian Nationalism: Imaginaries, Doctrines, and Political Battlefields. London: Routledge.

Locke, J. (1988). Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Meyendorff, J. (1981). Byzantium and the Rise of Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mughal, M. A. Z. (2023). Anthropological studies of time: historical development and theoretical directions. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, No. 7 (1), pp. 1–19.

Neumann, I. B. (1996). Russia and the Idea of Europe: A Study in Identity and International Relations. London: Routledge.

Obolensky, D. (1971). The Byzantine Commonwealth: Eastern Europe, 500–1453. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Putin, V. (2014). Address by President of the Russian Federation, 18 March. Available: http://en.special.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603 (viewed 03.01.2026).

Rabinow, P. (2008). Anthropology of the Contemporary. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Schmitt, C. (2005). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sharma, S. (2014). In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & Present, No. 38, pp. 56–97.

Downloads

Published

19.08.2026

Issue

Section

I. TIME ONTOLOGIES, PHILOSOPHY, AND CRITICAL THEORY