THE PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATIONS OF TIME IN MARXISM: KARL MARX’S BREAK WITH THE YOUNG HEGELIANS

Authors

  • MA, PhD student, Yingyao Jiang Renmin University of China, China
  • MA, PhD student, Mengyuan Luo South China Normal University, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol34.736

Keywords:

Young Hegelians, Karl Marx, time, philosophical revolution, historical materialism

Abstract

The concept of “time” constituted an internal and inescapable dimension of the Young Hegelians’ debates over the conception of history. Within the framework of speculative philosophy, the historical conceptions they articulated – and their corresponding understandings of time – largely inherited Hegel’s de-temporalizing tendency, in which time was subordinated to the movement of substance or of self-consciousness. More concretely, Max Stirner projected individual time onto the framework of human history, interpreting history as the unfolding of the “self”; Ludwig Feuerbach sought to restore time through his philosophy of species; Bruno Bauer, grounded in the philosophy of self-consciousness, treated “critique” as the very measure of time. Despite their internal polemics, all three failed to emancipate time from the internal structure of speculative philosophy. Confronting this impasse, Karl Marx broke decisively with the German idealist paradigm by advancing the understanding of the real human being beyond abstract anthropology and concretizing it as the subject of material production – an active being situated within determinate historical conditions and social relations. He further formulated the historical materialism, within which historical development is grounded in concrete social practice and time is redefined as a historically determinate process rather than the self-deduction of pure thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauer, B. (1845). Charakteristik Ludwig Feuerbach. Wigands Vierteljahrsschrift, No. 3, pp. 86–146.

Bloch, M. (2011). The Historian’s Craft. H. Yanhong (trans.). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.

Dai, X. & Liu, F. (2025). A Political Economy Critique of Temporal Domination in the Context of Digital Capitalism. Marxism & Reality, No. 4, pp. 139–145.

Feuerbach, L. (1984). The Collected Philosophical Works of Feuerbach. Vol. 1. R. Zhenhua et al. (trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Feuerbach, L. (1984). The Collected Philosophical Works of Feuerbach. Vol. 2. R. Zhenhua et al. (trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Feuerbach, L. (1989). The Essence of Christianity. G. Eliot (trans.). New York: Prometheus Books.

Hegel, G. (1962). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Vol. 1. H. Lin (trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Henrich, D. (2013). Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. X. Le (trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Hyppolite, J. (2024). Studies on Marx and Hegel. C. Qi (trans.). Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.

Jiang, H. & Xu, N. (2021). On Marx’s Critique of Stirner’s Historical Concept of Humanity. Beijing: Guangming Daily Publishing House.

Koselleck, R. (1985). Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. K. Tribe (trans.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Leopold, D. (2023). Max Stirner (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Available: https:// plato.stanford.edu/entries/max-stirner/ (viewed 16.12.2025).

Levine, N. (2016). Marx’s Discourse with Hegel. Y. Zhou et al. (trans.). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.

Li, Y. (1995). Man: The Sun of Religion – A Study on Feuerbach’s Philosophy of Religion. Taipei: Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd.

Liu, L.-d. (2022). Marx’s Criticism of Time and Time-Justice Theory: On Foreign Marxist Space Criticism of Time-Space Dialectics. Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University, No. 5, pp. 1–8.

Löwith, K. (2006). From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Thought. Q. Li (trans.). Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company.

Löwith, K. (2019). Hegel und die Aufhebung der Philosophie – Max Weber. X. Liu (trans.). Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.

Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1975). Marx-Engels Collected Works. Vol. 5. C. Dutt (trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Marx, K. & Engels, F. (1976). Marx-Engels Collected Works. Vol. 6. J. Cohen et al. (trans.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.

Moggach, D. (2003). The Philosophy and Politics of Bruno Bauer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Nie, J.-f. (2008). Grasping the Life Style: Shidina and Marx – Interpretation of an Excerpt from St. Max, a Chapter in German Ideology. Teaching and Research, No. 2, pp. 16–23.

Pan, Y. (2023). The Concept of Time in the Perspective of Young Marx: On the Formation of Marx’s Historical Materialism. Theory Monthly, No. 1, pp. 34–42.

Pan, Y. (2024). On the Question of Time in Marx’s Philosophy. PhD dissertation, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 09.05.2024.

Rosen, Z. (1977). Bruno Bauer and Karl Marx: The Influence of Bruno Bauer on Marx’s Thought. Netherlands: International Institute of Social History Amsterdam.

Shu, G. (2021). The Evolution from the Young Hegelians to the Marxist Concept of History. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

Stirner, M. (1845). Reensenten Stimers. Wigands Vierteljahrsschrift, No. 3, pp. 147–194. Stirner, M. (1995). The Ego and Its Own. D. Leopold (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stirner, M. (2009). The Ego and Its Own. H. Jin (trans.). Beijing: The Commercial Press. Wu, G. (2006). Ideas of Time. Beijing: Peking University Press.

Xia, Y. (2025). Philosophical Eras and Philosophy of the Era: How Is It Possible to Be the Philosophy of Changing the World. Jilin University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, No. 2, pp. 45–60.

Downloads

Published

19.08.2026

Issue

Section

I. TIME ONTOLOGIES, PHILOSOPHY, AND CRITICAL THEORY