CO-CREATION AS A MEANS OF CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT IN LOCAL CULTURAL POLICY MAKING

Authors

  • Mg.art. Ilona Asare L

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol17.73

Keywords:

co-creation, local cultural policy, participative cultural policy, citizen engagement.

Abstract

We have experienced a shift in local cultural policy making towards a more participative governance during the last decades in a situation when understanding of the meaning of culture in cultural policy has enlarged and cultural policy makers are concerned with more active actors in the field, including cultural prosumers. In the meantime, we can observe in our contemporary cities new creative forms of civic activism trying to build sustainable and livable places with creative professionals engaging as facilitators of these creative change processes in local communities. Co-creation approach is a recent trend in public governance to ensure the engage- ment of local citizens as equal partners in developing, implementing and evaluating creative solutions for local problems related to raising the quality of life. The application of co-creation approach in local cultural policy making is still comparatively new and experimental, but one can find multiple good practice case studies in Europe, although the understanding of this new concept varies in different contexts. The goal of this article is to analyse the available literature in order to clarify the use of co-creation concept in the field of culture in different contexts along with the similar concepts of co-production and co-design, to identify the purpose and possible gains of applying a co-creation approach in local cultural policy making. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alves, H. (2013). Co-creation and innovation in public services. The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 33, Nos. 7–8, pp. 671–682.

Bekkers, V. J. J. M., Tummers, L. G., Voorberg, W. H. (2015). A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, Vol. 17, Issue 9, pp. 1333–1357.

Bertacchini, E., Bravo, G., Marrelli, M. & Santagata, W. (2012). Cultural commons. A new perspective on the production and evolution of cultures. Glos: Edward Elgar.

Blomkamp, E. (2018). The Promise of Co-design for Public Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration. Vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 729–743. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12310 (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Bluestone, B., Carvalho, P. et al. (2012). Co-creating Cities. Defining Co-Creation as a Means of Citizen Engagement. Boston: Leading cities. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295103851_Co-Creating_Cities_Defining_cocreation_as_a_means_of_citizen_engagement (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Bollo, A., Da Milano, C., Gariboldi, A., Torch, C. (2017). Study on audience development – how to place audiences at the centre of creative organisations.

Brussels: European Commission. Available: https://op.europa.eu/en/publicationdetail/-/publication/cc36509d-19c6-11e7-808e-01aa75ed71a1

Bonet, L., Negrier, E. (2018). The participative turn in cultural policy: Paradigms,models, contexts. Poetics. Vol. 66, pp. 64–73.

Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., Steen, T. (2018). Co-production and co-creation. Engaging Citizens in Public Services. New York: Routledge.

Brudney J. L., England, R. E. (1983). Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review, vol. 43, n. 1, pp. 59–65.

Crossick, G., Kaszynska, P. (2016). Understanding the value of arts and culture. The AHRC Cultural Value project report. Available: https://ahrc.ukri.org/research/fundedthemesandprogrammes/culturalvalueproject/

Dorst, K. (2010). The Nature of Design Thinking. Proceedings of the 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, pp. 131–139. Sydney: University of Technology. Available:https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/16590 (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Garry, K., Goodwin, P. (2015). Towards cultural co-design. Connecting communities through culture. Merida Associates.

Lund, D. H. (2018). Co-creation in Urban Governance: From inclusion to Innovation. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 22(2), 3–17.

Miettinen, V, (2018). Redefining the Library: Co-Designing for Our Future Selves and Cities. Public Library Quarterly. Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 8–20.

Nasholm, M. H., Blomquist, T. (2015). The Meanings of Cocreation of Culture. Proceedings of the Eighth Interdisciplinary Conference of the University Network of the European Capitals of Culture, Sibiu. Available: https://uneecc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/UNeECC_Proceedings_2014_B5.pdf (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Nossel, S. (2016). Introduction: On “Artivism,” or Art’s Utility in Activism. Social Research, 83(1), 103–105, 225.

Palumbo, R., Trociolla, G. (2015). Co-producing services to enhance cultural heritage. The role of co-production in improving the quality of tourism services. Sinergie XXVII Annual Conference proceedings. Temoli, Italy. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282074861_Co-producing_services_to_enhance_cultural_heritage_The_role_of_co-production_in_improving_the_quality_of_tourism_services (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Simon, N. (2010). The Participatory Museum. San Francisco: MUSEUM.

Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: Bantam Dell Publishing.

Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 26, 145–152.

Vodsgaard, H. J. (2019). Co-creation in the field of culture and heritage. Interfolks Forlag. Available: https://co-op.one/onewebmedia/COOP,%20Symposium%20Compendium,%20EN,%20v1.pdf (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Warren, S., Jones, P. (2015). Economies, Creative Communities: Rethinking Place, Policy and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

Westen, R., Dijk, D. (2015). Good practices and methods for co-creation. Report of RICHES project. Available: https://resources.riches-project.eu/d4-2-goodpractices-and-methods-for-co-creation/ (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Zamenopoulos, T. and Alexiou, K. (2018). Co-Design as Collaborative Research. In: Facer, K. and Dunleavy, K. (eds.) Connected Communities Foundation Series. Bristol: University of Bristol/AHRC Connected Communities Programme. Available:http://oro.open.ac.uk/58301/ (viewed 28.04.2020.)

Downloads

Published

02.11.2022