ROLE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENT OF CONVENTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF ITS CONCEPTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol28.613Keywords:
Anthropology, Legal and non-legal, Intangible cultural heritage, UNESCO 2003 ConventionAbstract
International treaties and policy are often responsive to developments in scientific knowledge in predominantly non-legal disciplines, such as environmental protection, trade and investment. This involvement of non-legal expertise is mainly at the stage of policy-setting and aims to provide tools for implementing these instruments. The author of this chapter proposes that the degree of involvement of non-legal specialists, particularly those of cultural anthropology and ethnology, has been more profound than is normally the case, and has exercised a continuing influence over the process of the initial development, subsequent policy-setting and implementation of UNESCO’s 2003 Convention, which is unusual. This is not surprising in view of the strong human (cultural) rights orientation of the 2003 Convention and influence of the discipline of anthropology on development of that field of law and the subsequent jurisprudence of treaty bodies. Placing the discussion within broader framework of mutual interaction between and influence of the fields of law and anthropology, the current chapter traces the role of anthropological, ethnological and related social science expertise from before and during the treaty’s drafting and its subsequent implementation up until today, concluding that this relationship, whilst presenting challenges, has overall been positive and continues to map the future orientations for the 2003 Convention.
Downloads
References
Aikawa-Faure, N. (2008). From the Proclamation of Masterpieces to the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. In: Smith, L., Aikawa- Faure, N. (eds.). Intangible Heritage. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 13–44.
Arantes, A. (2020). Formation of the Notion of ‘Safeguarding’ Adopted by the 2003 Convention. In: Blake, J., Lixinski, L. (eds.). The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Commentary. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 455– 469.
Arizpe, L. (2007). The Cultural Politics of Intangible Cultural Heritage. In: Blake, J. (ed.). Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage: Challenges and Approaches: A Collection of Essays. Builth Wells: Institute of Art & Law.
Blake, J. (2006). Commentary on the 2003 UNESCO Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.
Blake, J. (2001). Developing a New Standard-Setting Instrument for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage: Elements for Consideration. Paris: UNESCO. Available: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000123744
Blake, J. (2015). International Cultural Heritage Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cameron, C. (2005). Evolution of the Application of ‘Outstanding Universal Value’ for Cultural and Natural Heritage. Special Expert Meeting of the World Heritage Convention on The Concept of Outstanding Universal Value, Kazan, Russian Federation, 6–9 April 2005. UNESCO Doc. WHC-05/29.COM/INF.9R.
Daes, E. I. (1997). Protection of the Heritage of Indigenous People. New York: United Nations. Deacon, H., Beazley, O. (2007). The Safeguarding of Intangible Heritage Values under the World Heritage Convention: Auschwitz, Hiroshima and Robben Island. In:
Blake, J. (ed.). Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage – Challenges and Approaches. Builth Wells: Institute of Art and Law, pp. 93–108.
Falk Moore, S. (2019). Law and Anthropology: Research Traditions. In: Nafziger, J. A. R. (ed.). Comparative Law and Anthropology. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 16–27.
Francioni, F. (2020). Art. 2(1) Defining Intangible Cultural Heritage. In: Blake, J., Lixinski, L. (eds.). The 2003 UNESCO Intangible Heritage Convention: A Com- mentary. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Gluckman, M. (1973). The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. 2nd ed.
Manchester: Manchester University Press.
International Experts for the 2003 UNESCO Convention (2002). Intangible Cultural Heritage: Priority Domains for an International Convention. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UNESCO Doc. RIO/ITH/2002/WD/10.
Kurin, R. (2004). Safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: a critical appraisal. Museum International, No. 56 (1–2), pp. 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350775.2004.00459.x
Lixinski, L. (2015). Between Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy: The Troubled Relationships between Heritage Studies and Heritage Law. International Journal of Heritage Studies, No. 21 (3), pp. 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.922113
Malinowski, B. (1926). Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.; New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. Available: http://archive.org/details/crimecustominsav00mali
Mundy, M., Kelly, T. (2002). Introduction. In: Mundy, M. (ed.). Law and Anthropology.
Aldershot; Burlington: Ashgate/Dartmouth.
Munjeri, D. (2004). Tangible and Intangible Heritage: from difference to convergence. Museum International, No. 56 (1–2), pp. 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1350775.2004.00453.x
Nafziger, J. A. R. (ed.). (2019). Comparative Law and Anthropology. Cheltenham; Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Prott, L. V. (1998). Understanding One Another on Cultural Rights. In: Nieć, H. (ed.). Cultural Rights and Wrongs: A Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the 50th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 161–175.
Prott, L. V., O’Keefe, P. J. (eds.). (1984). Law and the Cultural Heritage. London: Butterworth.
Tora, S. (2001). Report on the Pacific Regional Seminar. In: Seitel, P. (ed.). Safeguarding Traditional Cultures: A Global Assessment. Washington, D.C.: Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage, Smithsonian Institution.
UNESCO. (1999). Final Conference Report. International Conference A Global Assessment of the 1989 Recommendation on the Safeguarding of Traditional Culture and Folklore: Local Empowerment and International Cooperation. Washington, D.C., 27–30 June. Available: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/0011EN.pdf
UNESCO Intangible Heritage Section, Fondazione Premio Grinzane Cavour. (2001). International Round Table on Intangible Cultural Heritage – Working Definitions. Turin: UNESCO.
Zanten, W. V. (2004). Constructing New Terminology for Intangible Cultural Heritage. Museum International, No. 56 (1–2), pp. 36–44.
Conventions and other legal documents
Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Rio: UN, 1760 UNTS 79; 31 ILM 818. General Assembly of State Parties to the 2003 UNESCO Convention. (2008). Operational
Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible
Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2nd session, 16–19 June, amended at its 3rd session, 2010.
General Assembly of State Parties to the 2003 UNESCO Convention. (2016). Operational Directives for the Implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2nd session, 30 May–1 June, amended at its 6th session.
Mexico City Declaration on Cultural Policies (Mondicault Declaration). (1982). Mexico City: UNESCO, World Conference on Cultural Policies.
Model provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions (Model provisions). (1982). Geneva. Available: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=186459
World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future (the Brundtland Report). (1987).
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. (2007).
UNESCO/WIPO. (1984). Draft Treaty for the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions.
Case law
Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua, No. (Ser. C) No. 79 (2001) (IACtHR 31 August 2001).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
