REPRODUCTION OF ARTIST’S UNIQUE VISUAL STYLE. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) – TOOL FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF CREATIVE PROCESSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol33.600Keywords:
generative AI, Stable Diffusion, artistic style, authorship, cognitive processesAbstract
This study is dedicated to examination of the ways how generative AI, specifically trained open-source models by Stable Diffusion, can support reproducing an artist’s unique visual style. Conducted across four semesters (2023–2025) at the Art Academy of Latvia, the research investigates the pedagogical and creative outcomes of teaching students to train personalized AI models using their artworks as datasets, further combining other tools with the trained models during the study process.
A mixed-method approach – combining surveys, AI image recognition tests, semi-structured interviews, practical assignments, and qualitative observation – was applied to assess the effectiveness of AI-assisted style reproduction. The study evaluates challenges related to further combining models and learned tools, dataset preparation, authorship, and the discussion and research about cognitive differences between human and machine creativity.
Findings show that personalized model training can enhance creative autonomy, enabling results closer to an artist’s unique visual style than generic AI tools. However, the process also reveals ethical and conceptual tensions regarding authorship, randomness, and control. The study concludes that, when applied critically and reflectively, generative AI can serve as a powerful tool for both creative exploration and pedagogical development.
Downloads
References
Bartoli, E., Smith, J., and Lee, A. (2024). Default Mode Network Electrophysiological Dynamics and Causal Role in Creative Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae199
Boisvert, H. (2024). AI Creativity: Genius or Gimmick? World Science Festival. Video, 40:00. Filmed on 27 September 2024. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wU49MKIhMRU (viewed 06.09.2024.)
Cohen, H. (1995). The Art of AARON, and the AARON of Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guerrero Guerrero, M. (2024). Midjourney and Its Future Implications for Intellectual Property regarding Content Generated by AI. Available: https://chambers.com/articles/midjourney-and-its-future-implications-for-intellectual-property-regarding-content-generated-by-arti (viewed 02.08.2024.)
Grunert, P. F., Craglia, M., Gómez, E., and Thielen-del Pozo, J. (eds.). (2022). HumaniTies and Artificial Intelligence. Noema Media Publishing. Available: https://noemalab.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/HumaniTies-and-Artificial-Intelligence-v1.1.pdf (viewed 16.05.2024.)
Magdy, H. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence Art Generator ‘Midjourney’ in Artistic and Advertising Creativity. Journal of Design Sciences and Applied Arts, 4(2), 42–58. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371377778_The_Use_of_Artificial_Intelligence_Art_Generator_Midjourney_in_Artistic_and_Advertising_Creativity Available: https://doi.org/10.21608/jdsaa.2023.169144.1231 (viewed 01.08.2024.)
Haynes, G. (2024). Human or AI?: The Nuances of Intelligence. Available: https://www.kornferry.com/content/dam/kornferryv2/pdf/institute/kfi-human-or-ai-series-part-1. pdf (viewed 15.07.2024.)
Kelomees, R., Guljajeva, V., Laas, O. (2022). The Meaning of Creativity in the Age of AI. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Arts. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375696443_The_Meaning_of_Creativity_in_the_Age_of_AI (viewed 11.05.2024.)
Kahneman D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Harvard, P. S. (2013). Two Hs from Harvard to Habsburg or Creative Semantics About Creativity: A Prelude to Creativity. In: Carayannis, E. G. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_2
Manovich, L. (2021–2024). Artificial Aesthetics: Generative AI, Art, and Visual Media. Available: http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/artificial-aesthetics (viewed 10.06.2024.)
Manovich, L. (2023/2024). Memory, Draw. In Exhibition Catalog. Available: http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/memory-draw (viewed 01.06.2024.)
Marquis, E., Vajoczki, S. (2012). Creative Differences: Teaching Creativity Across the Disciplines. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), article 6. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060106
Midjourney (2024). Terms of Service. Available: https://docs.midjourney.com/docs/terms-of-service (viewed 10.08.2024.)
Mirzoeff, N. (2006). An Introduction to Visual Culture. London: Routledge.
Shawn, S., Ding, W., Passananti, J., Wu, S., Zheng, H., Zhao, Y. B. (2023). Nightshade: Prompt-Specific Poisoning Attacks on Text-to-Image Generative Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13828
Stability AI (2024). Stable Diffusion XL Base 1.0 – Technical Overview. Available: https://huggingface.co/stabilityai/stable-diffusion-xlbase-1.0 (viewed 04.06.2024.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Culture Crossroads

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.