BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF MAPPING KAZDANGA

Authors

  • Mg. art. Zane Grigoroviča Latvian Academy of Culture, Latvia
  • Mg. art. Luīze Frančeska Dakša Latvian Academy of Culture, Latvia
  • Bc. art. Sanda Paukšte Latvian Academy of Culture, Latvia
  • Diāna Mierture Latvian Academy of Culture, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol33.572

Keywords:

Kazdanga, cultural heritage, place identity, data visualization, digital humanities

Abstract

In this article, the authors examine the digital mapping of cultural heritage and place identity in Kazdanga, Latvia, employing an interdisciplinary approach that integrates historical, ethnographic, and digital humanities methodologies. Through field research, archival analysis, and community engagement, the research has been aimed at exploring the interaction of spatial, temporal, and social dimensions in shaping local identity. Using the Palladio tool for data structuring and visualisation, the authors critically assess the methodological challenges of representing heterogeneous and intangible cultural heritage data in digital formats. The findings highlight the significance of both material and immaterial heritage in constructing place identity, emphasizing the relationship between historical continuity and socio-cultural transformation. The research challenges the limitations of existing metadata standards in capturing the heterogeneous and dynamic nature of local heritage. By demonstrating the potential of digital visualisation for cultural heritage research, the authors advocate for participatory and reflexive approaches that integrate community perspectives into digital heritage initiatives, encouraging sustainable engagement with local history and identity.

Supporting Agencies
Project “Kazdanga – from place stories to community identity networking and cultural heritage digitization” is supported by the research project programme “Development of Scientific Activities at the Latvian Academy of Culture” of the Institute of Arts and Cultural Studies of the Latvian Academy of Culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Birzniece, M. (2006). Lejaskurzemes teikas, nostāsti un spoku stāsti. Liepāja: LiePA. Brastiņš, E. (1923). I. Kuršu zeme. Latvijas pilskalni. Rīga: Vālodze.

Castells, M. (2000). Globalisation, identity and the state. Social Dynamics, 26(1), 6–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533950008458682

Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde (2023). Kazdangas parks. Available: https://www.daba.gov.lv/lv/kazdangas-parks (viewed 03.01.2025.)

Dienvidkurzemes novada pašvaldība (2023). Publiskais pārskats par 2023. gadu. Available: https://www.varam.gov.lv/lv/media/39105/download?attachment?attachment. (viewed 28.12.2024.)

Drucker, J. (2020). Visualization and interpretation: Humanistic approaches to display. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12523.001.0001

Hānbergs, Ē. (1970). Valātas mantinieki. Rīga: Liesma.

ICOMOS International Cultural Tourism Committee (2002). ICOMOS International Cultural Tourism Charter. Available: https://www.icomos.no/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/ICTC-Charter.pdf (viewed 27.01.2025.)

Jenkins, R. (2008). Social Identity. 3rd ed. London and New York: Routledge.

Kermani, A. A. et al. (2016). Developing a Model for the Relation between Heritage and Place Identity. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 10, 406–411.

Latvijas Republikas Ministru kabinets (1999, 22. aprīlis). Pašvaldības teritorijā dzīvojošo iedzīvotāju skaits un struktūra un pašvaldībai aprēķināta finansu nepieciešamība. Latvijas Vēstnesis. LR ofic. laikr. Nr. 123–124. Available: https://periodika.lndb.lv/periodika2-viewer/?lang=fr#issue:368786 (viewed 09.06.2025.)

Leja, A. (1999). Cik jauki Kazdangā. Rīga: Poligrāfists.

LR Saeima (2016). Nemateriālā kultūras mantojuma likums.

LR Saeima (2016). Nemateriālā kultūras mantojuma likums. Latvijas Vēstnesis, 204, 20.10.2016. Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/285526 (viewed 05.01.2025.)

Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Mašnovskis, V. (2019). Kazdangas muiža/ Katzdangen. Muižas Latvijā: Vēsture, arhitektūra, māksla II. Rīga: SIA “DUE”.

Mežsēta, J. et al. (2008/2013). Kazdangas parks un tā Dieviņš. Liepāja: LiePA.

Muktupāvela, R., Laķe, A. (2022). Kopienas jēdziena konceptualizācija, kopienu daudzveidība un kultūras mantojuma kopienas kā īpašs kopienas veids. In: Muktupāvela, R., Laķe,

R. A., Tjarve, B. (zin. red.), Kultūras mantojuma kopienas: prakses, attīstība un izaicinājumi. Latvijas Kultūras akadēmija. Rīga: Jāņa Rozes apgāds.

Peng, J., Strijker, D., Wu, Q. (2020). Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings? Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294

Stanford Humanities + Design. (n.d.). Palladio. Stanford University. Available: https://hdlab.stanford.edu/palladio/ (viewed 07.06.2025.)

Šlipenbahs, U., fon. (2023). Gleznaini ceļojumi par Kurzemi. Aizpute: Serde.

Tilley, C. (2006). Introduction: Identity, Place, Landscape and Heritage. Journal of Material Culture, 11(1–2), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506062990

UNESCO (2003). Text of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Available: https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention (viewed 07.06.2025.)

Windhager, F. et al. (2019) Visualization of Cultural Heritage Collection Data: State of the Art and Future Challenges. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(6), 2311–2330, 1 June 2019, https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2830759

Downloads

Published

15.04.2026

Issue

Section

CULTURAL HERITAGE