THE FRICTION BETWEEN MEMORY ANDHISTORY: MNEMOHISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE IN CONTEMPORARY LATVIAN POETRY

Authors

  • Dr. philol. Anda Kuduma Riga Technical University, Liepāja Academy, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol31.566

Keywords:

mnemohistorical perspective, postmemory generation, memory sites, war, women’s poetry

Abstract

Nowadays, in the creation of historical narratives, fiction texts are gaining increasing importance alongside historical research. It is attested by the topical trends in the early 21st century Latvian literary process manifested in the interpretation of historical topics. This article aims to highlight the significance of literature in the process of forming cultural memory and constructing historical perceptions, thereby soothing the existing friction between history and memory in historical research.

The article focuses on the interpretation of the events of the Second World War in contemporary Latvian women’s poetry. As source texts the article uses poems by Andra Manfelde, Daina Sirmā and Gunta Šnipke. In the selected poetry examples, the trend of reviving historical memory and the application of a mnemohistorical perspective have been analysed. The theoretical and methodological base of the article comprises studies of mnemonic history and microhistory, research on postmemory and the ethics of memory, as well as cultural memory and trauma studies.

The examples of poetry texts by Manfelde, Sirmā and Šnipke analysed in the article reflect life writing tendencies and are highly auto/biographical. The biographical approach provides an artistic platform for the infusion of personal microhistory into the collective/nation’s historical narrative. Literature thus offers a more comprehensive view of past events and their later impact and significance in a contemporary context. The poetic transformation of the wartime memories of the postmemory generation into poetry outlines the mnemohistorical perspective, bringing to the forefront the relevance of current political events.

Supporting Agencies
This research is funded by the Latvian Council of Science, project “Navigating the Latvian History of the 20th–21st Century: Social Morphogenesis, Legacy and Challenges” (No. VPP-IZM-Vēsture-2023/1-0003).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assmann, A. (2013). Das neue Unbehagen an der Erinnerungskultur: Eine Intervention. München, Verlag C.H.Beck GmbH & Co.

Assmann, A. (2014). Theories of Cultural Memory and the Concept of “Afterlife”. In: Tamm, M. (ed.) Afterlife of Events. Perspectives on Mnemohistory. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 79–94.

Assmann, J. (1998). Moses the Egyptian: The Memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Harvard University.

Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and cultural memory. In: Erll, A., Nünning, A. (eds.) Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, pp. 109–118.

Balode, I. (2024). Apelsīni – jā, citroni – nē. Intervija ar Andru Manfeldi. Domuzīme, Nr. 5. 31.–35. lpp.

Benjamin, W. (2007). ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’. In: Arendt, H. (ed.) Walter Benjamin, Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, trans. by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, pp. 253–64.

Didi-Huberman, G. (2002). L’ image survivante: Histoire de l’art et temps des fantômes selon Aby Warburg. Paris: Minuit.

Hirsch, M. (2012). The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. Columbia University Press.

Manfelde, A. (2022). Poēma ar mammu. Rīga: SIA “Dienas Grāmata”.

Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. In: Representations, No. 26, Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory. University of California Press Stable, pp. 7–24.

LaCapra, D. (2016). Trauma, History, Memory, Identity: what remains? History and Theory, 55, October, pp. 375–400.

Ricoeur, P. (2004). Memory, History, Forgetting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Runia, E. (2006). Presence. In: History and Theory, 45, February, pp. 1–29.

Tamm, M. (2013). Beyond History and Memory: New Perspectives in Memory Studies. History Compass, June, pp. 459–473.

Tamm, M. (2014). Introduction: Afterlife of Events: Perspectives on Mnemohistory. In: Tamm, M. (ed.) Afterlife of Events. Perspectives on Mnemohistory, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–27.

Sirmā, D. (2017). Dievaines. Rīga: Pētergailis.

Šnipke, G. (2018). Ceļi. Rīga: SIA “Apgāds Mansards”. Šnipke, G. (2024). Kā. Rīga: AS “Latvijas Mediji”.

Schwab, G. (2010). Haunting Legacies: Violent Histories and Transgenerational Trauma. New York: Columbia University Press.

Downloads

Published

30.12.2025

Issue

Section

MEMORY STUDIES AND MNEMOHISTORY