AUTOFICTION AS A MEDIUM OF MNEMOHISTORY IN THE CONTEXT OF PARADIGM TRANSFORMATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol31.554Keywords:
documentary facts, fiction, mnemohistory, postmodernism, metamodernismAbstract
One of the most significant genres in Western contemporary literature is autofiction. Its orientation towards remembering the individual past and history has provoked reflections on a transformation of cultural paradigm and linked to the development of mnemohistory and the concept of literature as the shapers of cultural memory.
This paper examines the autofiction genre as the mnemohistorical medium through which individual memories are expressed. Using the insights of individual postmodernist and metamodernist theorists as sources, we can see the changes in autofiction over the past decades.
Since the first decade of the 21st century, in Latvian prose, we can see various elements of autofiction and differentiate some groups of texts. A vivid contemporary autofiction is Svens Kuzmins’ novel Brīvībene (Orbīta, 2024). The article aims to characterise Kuzmins’ autofiction in the context of postmodernism and metamodernism, highlighting reinterpreting historical events through personal lenses as an eventual example of paradigm transformation and the medium od mnemohistory. The study’s results show oscillations between documentary facts and fiction, irony and sincerity, and the search for identity, historicity, and depth. These mark the existence of several elements of metamodernism and demonstrate that literature can be an active participant in the process of mnemohistory. Metamodernism and mnemohistory share a position of active engagement, focusing on reinterpreting the past to create meaningful frameworks for the present.
Downloads
References
Assmann, J. (1997). Moses the Egyptian: The memory of Egypt in Western Monotheism. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Assmann, J. (2008). Communicative and Culture Memory. In: Erll, A., & Nünning, A. (eds.) Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 109–118.
Arquilla, J. (2011). The (B)end of History. Francis Fukuyama was wrong, and 2011 proves it. Foreign Policy, 27 December. Available: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/12/15/the-bend-of-history/ (viewed 01.11.2024.)
Czyżak, A. (2024). Autofikcja. Autobiografia. Literatura. Kultura. Media, 2(15), 93–98 ISSN 2353-8694, e-ISSN 2717-4361. https://doi.org/10.18276/au.2020.2.15-07
Doubrovsky, S. (1977). Fils. Paris: Éditions Galilée.
Genette, G. (1993). Fiction & Diction. Transl. by C. Porter. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.
Gibbons, A. (2015). ‘“Take that you intellectuals” and “KaPOW!”: Adam Thirlwell and the Metamodernist Future of Style. Studia Neophilologica, 87 (Supp. 1), 29–43.
Gibbons, A., Vermeulen, T., van den Akker, R. (2019). Reality beckons: metamodernist depthiness beyond panfictionality. European Journal of English Studies, 23(2), 172–189.
Grell, I. (2014). L’autofiction. Paris: Armand Colin.
Gronemann, A. (2019). Autofiction. Wagner-Egelhaaf, M. (2019). Handbook of Autobiography/ Autofiction. Berlin: De Gruyter. Available: https://research-ebsco-com.resursi.rtu.lv/linkprocessor/plink?id=eea4f866-5650-3bee-a517-e3dc98271889. (viewed 04.01.2025.)
Gūtmane, Z. (2024). The Potential of Cultural Memory: The Latvian Novel Series “Mēs. Latvija, XX gadsimts” (2014–2018). Laurušaitė, L., Jankutė, V. (eds.) Acta Litteraria Comparativa. Reviving memory and overcoming oblivion: comparative aspects. Collection of articles, Nr. 10. Vilnius: Institute of Lithuanian Literature and Folklore, pp. 41–63. Available: https://www.llla.lt/en/_files/ugd/0482f3_c3e53dfac5d5426e953396880407a3ad.pdf (viewed 12.01.2025.)
Heidenreich, R. (2018). Literary impostors: Canadian autofiction of the early twentieth century. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Hutcheon, L. (1988). A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction. New York: Routledge.
Hutcheon, L. (1989). Historiographic Metafiction. Parody and the Intertextuality of History. In: O’Donnell, P. & Robert C.D. (eds.) Intertextuality and Contemporary American Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 3–32.
Hutcheon, L. (2002). The Politics of Postmodernism, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Jacobi, C., Ott, C., & Schönwälder, L. (2022). Autofiction(s) et scandale (Vol. 12). Munich: Akademische Verlagsgemeinschaft München (AVM). https://doi.org/ 10.23780/9783960915973
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, Or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Available: https://archive.org/details/FredricJameson.PostmodernismOrTheCulturalLogicOfLateCapitalism1990/page/n33/mode/2up (viewed 10.10. 2024.)
Lejeune, Ph. (1989). The autobiographical pact. In: Eakin, P. J. (ed.) On Autobiography.
Trans. K.M. Leary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–30.
Martínez-Alfaro, M.J., Pellicer-Ortín, S. (2017). Introduction: Memory Frictions – Conflict – Negotiation – Politics in Contemporary Literature in English. In: Martínez-Alfaro, M.J., Pellicer-Ortín, S. (eds.) Memory Frictions in Contemporary Literature, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miceli, S. (2024). Autofiction as (self-) criticism: suggestions from recent Brazilian literature. Procházka, M. (ed.) From Shakespeare to Autofiction: Approaches to authorship after Barthes and Foucault. London: UCL Press, pp. 141–157. https://doi. org/10.14324/111.9781800086548
Procházka, M. (2024). From Shakespeare to Autofiction: Approaches to authorship after Barthes and Foucault. London: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.9781800086548
Roche, R-Y., Grell, I. & Burgelin, C. (2010). Autofiction(s). Presses universitaires de Lyon. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pul.3546
Topol, O. (2024). European prose in transformation (Part 2) The European Writers’ Festival returns to the British Library. The British Library. European Studies blog. 14.05. 2024. Available: European prose in transformation (Part 2) The European Writers’ Festival returns to the British Library - European studies blog (viewed 12.01.2025.)
Van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A. & Vermeulen, T. (eds.) (2017). Metamodernism: Historicity, Affect, and Depth after Postmodernism. London; New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Van den Akker, R., Gibbons, A. & Vermeulen, T. (2019) Metamodernism: Period, Structure of Feeling, and Cultural Logic – A case study in Contemporary Autofiction. In: Askin, R., Beckman, F. & Rudrum, D. (eds.) New Directions in Philosophy and Literature. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 41–54.
Wagner-Egelhaaf, M. (2019). Introduction: Autobiography/Autofiction Across Disciplines. In: Wagner-Egelhaaf, M. Handbook of Autobiography/ Autofiction. Berlin: De Gruyter. Available: https://research-ebsco-com.resursi.rtu.lv/linkprocessor/plink?id=eea4f866-5650-3bee-a517-e3dc98271889. (viewed 04.01.2025.)
Vermeulen, T. & Van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on Metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 2(1). Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3402/ jac.v2i0.5677 (viewed 27.12. 2024.)
Worthington, M. (2018). The Story of “Me”: Contemporary American Autofiction. University of Nebraska Press.
Žurnāls “Domuzīme” (2018). Izrāvumi no tumsas. Diskusija par romānu ciklu “Mēs. Latvija, XX gadsimts”. Delfi Kultūra, 10.10. Available: https://www.delfi.lv/kultura/news/books/izravumino-tumsas-diskusija-par-romanu-ciklu-mes-latvija-xx-gadsimts.d?id=50449031 (viewed 22.08. 2024.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
