THE ROLE AND READINESS OF LIBRARIANS IN PROMOTING DIGITAL LITERACY: A CASE STUDY FROM LATVIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol20.5Keywords:
public library, librarian, mediation, digital literacy, youthAbstract
Rapid development of digital technologies significantly transforms the world, and it demands new approaches to the education. Formal education systems are not ready to provide digital skills needed for citizens to follow those changes. Informal, nonformal and lifelong education become more significant source of knowledge in this area and public libraries as well as librarians are expected to play a significant role in promoting of digital literacy. The main goal of this study is to understand the readiness of librarians from public libraries to be promoters of digital literacy and their awareness about their role in this context. Discussion in this article is based on findings of a case study in Latvia. Data were collected using qualitative research methods including focus group discussions with library experts and in-depth interviews with librarians from public libraries. Research results indicated that librarians do not have a clear understanding of their role, rights and responsibilities in supervising of young people`s digital activities in public libraries. Non-awareness of their role as mediators of digital literacy together with lack of time and insufficient technological preparedness seem to create a risk for librarians to a giving-up attitude, but if not giving-up then applying restrictive mediation practices. Results indicated that active, collaborative mediation practices are still in the evolving stage. Research results suggested that it is very important to support librarians via providing them opportunities to participate in professional development programs raising awareness about their role as mediators of digital literacy and increasing their readiness for that role.
Downloads
References
Austin, Z., & Sutton, J. (2014). Qualitative research: Getting started. Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol. 67(6), pp. 436–440. Available: https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v67i6.1406 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2008). Case study methods. In: C. Reus-Smit, & D. Snidal (eds.). The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 498–517. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.003.0029 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3(2), pp. 77–101. Available: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa (viewed 09.06.2021).
Brikse, I., & Spurava, G. (2014). Kids Online – Safety and Risks: Full Findings from Children Survey of 9- to 16-Year-Olds in Latvia. Riga: Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Latvia. Available: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60574/ (viewed 09.06.2021).
Brikše, I., Freibergs, V., & Spurava, G. (2014). Children’s internet competence vs. self-confidence and self-comfort: Case study of Latvia. Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 492, pp. 233–242. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14136-7_25 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Buckingham, D. (2019). Teaching media in a ‘post-truth’ age: fake news, media bias and the challenge for media/digital literacy education / La ensenanza mediática en la era de la posverdad: fake news, sesgo mediático y el reto para la educación en materia de alfabetización mediática y digital. Cultura y Educación. 31. 1–19. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2019.1603814
Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, Vol. 10, Iss. 6., pp. 807–815. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., et al. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review. Vol. 66(1), pp. 60–93. Available: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u (viewed 09.06.2021).
Clegg, T., & Subramaniam, M. (2018). Redefining Mentorship in Facilitating Interest-Driven Learning in Libraries. In: Reconceptualizing Libraries. London: Routledge, pp. 140–157. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315143422-9 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Cross-Sectoral Coordination Center (2020). Latvijas Nacionālās attīstības plāns 2020–2027. Rīga: VARAM. Pieejams: https://pkc.gov.lv/sites/default/files/inline-files/NAP2027__ENG.pdf
European Commission. (2020). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2020. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/desi (viewed 09.06.2021.)
Field, N., & Tran, R. (2018). Reinventing the public value of libraries. Public Library Quarterly, Vol. 37(2), pp. 113–126. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1422174 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publications.
Grossberg, L., Wartella, E., & Whitney, D. C. (1998). MediaMaking: Mass Media in a Popular Culture. London, New Delhi, Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications.
Hobbs, R. (2016). Literacy. In: The International Encyclopedia of Communication Theory and Philosophy. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect162 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Hobbs, R., & Coiro, J. (2018). Design features of a professional development program in digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, Vol. 62(4), pp. 401–409. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.907 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Hobbs R., Deslauriers, L., & Steager, P. (2019). The Library Screen Scene: Film and Media Literacy in Schools, Colleges, and Communities. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190854317.001.0001 (viewed 09.06.2021).
IFLA (2017). IFLA Statement on Digital Literacy. Available: https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11586 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Interdepartmental Coordination Center (2020). Latvijas Nacionālās attīstības plans 2020–2027. Rīga: VARAM.
Janes, J. (2013). The Librarian in 2020. Reinventing Libraries. Library Journal. October 10, 2013 issue. Available: http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2013/10/future-oflibraries/the-librarian-in-2020-reinventing-libraries/#_ (viewed 09.06.2021).
Jiow, H. J., Lim, S. S., & Lin, J. (2017). Level Up! Refreshing Parental Mediation Theory for Our Digital Media Landscape. Communication Theory, Vol. 27(3), pp. 309–328. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12109 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Jones, R., & Hafner, C. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies: A Practical Introduction. London: Routledge. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095317 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Kalmus, V., von Feilitzen, C., & Siibak, A. (2012). Effectiveness of teachers’ and peers’ mediation in supporting opportunities and reducing risks online. In: Children, Risk and Safety on the Internet: Research and Policy Challenges in Comparative Perspective. Bristol: Bristol University Press, Policy Press, pp. 245–256. Available: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgt5z.24 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Karaseva, A., Siibak, A., & Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, P. (2015). Relationships between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs, subject cultures, and mediation practices of students’ use of digital technology. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychological Research on Cyberspace, Vol. 9(1). Available: https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2015-1-6 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Koh, K., & Abbas, J. (2016). Competencies Needed to Provide Teen Library Services of the Future: A Survey of Professionals in Learning Labs and Makerspaces. The Journal of Research on Libraries and Young Adults, Vol. 7(2), pp. 1–26. Available: https://doi.org/10.12783/issn.2328-2967/56/2/3 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2015). Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies: Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. Vol. 10, pp. 8–20. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891- 943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-02
Latvijas Nacionālā bibliotēka (n.d.). Bibliotēku statistika. Available: https://www.lnb.lv/lv/latvijas-biblioteku-statistiskas-informacijas-apkoposana (viewed 09.06.2021).
Latvijas Republikas Kultūras ministrija (2021). Kultūrpolitikas pamatnostādnes, 2021–2027. gadam: Projekts. Available: https://www.km.gov.lv/lv/media/13169/download (viewed 09.06.2021).
Lison, B., Reip, N. (2016). The new role of public libraries in local communities: Research for CULT committee. Brussels: European Parliament. Available: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e08310f1-5efe-11e8-ab9c-01aa75ed71a1 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Livingstone, S. M. (1990). Making Sense of Television: The Psychology of Audience Interpretation. International Series in Experimental Social Psychology. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Livingstone, S. M., & Haddon, L. (2009). Kids online: opportunities and risks for children. Bristol: Policy Press.
Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. (2008). Parental mediation of children’s Internet use. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, Vol. 52(4), pp. 581–599. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150802437396 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Martín-Barbero, J. (1993). Communication, Culture and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations. Sage.
Martín-Barbero, J. (2006). A Latin American perspective on communication/cultural mediation. Global Media and Communication No. 2, pp. 279–297. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766506069579 (viewed 09.06.2021).
McDougall, J., & Potter, J. (2018). Digital media learning in the third space. Media Practice and Education, Vol. 20(1), pp. 1–11. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2018.1511362 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: An introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 38(4), pp. 355–367. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.783597 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Miettinen, V. (2018). Redefining the Library: Co-Designing for Our Future Selves and Cities. Public Library Quarterly, Vol. 37(1), pp. 8–20. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2017.1379348 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Ministry of Education and Culture (2019). Media Literacy in Finland: National media education policy. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, 2019:39. Available: https://medialukutaitosuomessa.fi/en/ (viewed 09.06.2021).
Ojaranta, A., & Litmanen-Peitsala, P. (2019). Digital Skills in Finnish Public Libraries to Engage in the National Operating Model for Digital Support for Citizens. International Federation of Library Associations and Institution. Available: http://library.ifla.org/id/eprint/2671/1/s05-2019-ojaranta-en.pdf
Oļesika, A., Lāma, G., & Rubene, Z. (2021). Conceptualization of Digital Competence: Perspectives From Higher Education. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society. Vol 12(2). Available: https://10.4018/IJSEUS.2021040105
Pangrazio, L. (2014). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol. 37(2), pp. 163–174. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Public Libraries 2030 (2019). EU Library Factsheets. Available: https://publiclibraries2030.eu/resources/eu-library-factsheets/ (viewed 09.06.2021).
Sawaya, J., Maswabi, T., Taolo, R., Andrade, P., Moreno Grez, M., Pacheco, P., Paberza, K., Vigante, S., Kurutyte, A., Rutkauskiene, U., Ježowska, J., Kochanowicz, M. (2011). Advocacy and evidence for sustainable public computer access: Experiences from the Global Libraries Initiative. Library Review, Vol. 60(6), pp. 448–472. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111147189 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Scolari, C. A. (2015). From (New)Media to (Hyper)Mediation. Recovering Jesús Martín-Barbero’s Mediation Theory in the Age of Digital Communication and Cultural Convergence. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 18(9), pp. 1092–1107. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1018299 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Secker, J. (2018). The Trouble with Terminology: Rehabilitating and Rethinking ‘Digital Literacy.’ In: Digital Literacy Unpacked, pp. 3–16. Available: https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783301997.003 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Sefton-Green, J., Nixon, H., & Erstad, O. (2009). Reviewing Approaches and Perspectives on “Digital Literacy.” Pedagogies: An International Journal, Vol. 4(2), pp. 107–125. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800902741556 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Olafsson, K., Livingstone, S., and Hasebrink, U. (2020). EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. Available: https://www.lse.ac.uk/media-andcommunications/research/research-projects/eu-kids-online/eu-kids-online-2020 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Turner, K. H., Jolls, T., Hagerman, M. S., O’Byrne, W., Hicks, T., Eisenstock, B., & Pytash, K. E. (2017). Developing digital and media literacies in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, Vol. 140, pp. 122–126. Available: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1758P (viewed 09.06.2021).
Vassilakaki, E., & Moniarou-Papaconstantinou, V. (2015). A systematic literature review informing library and information professionals’ emerging roles. New Library World, Vol. 116, pp. 37–66. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-05-2014-0060 (viewed 09.06.2021).
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Zignani, T., Massara, F., Doncheva, A., Tarandova S., Holma, B., Pakalna, D. (2020). Librarianship in Europe – mapping professional needs. Available: https://www.biblio-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/BIBLIO_WP2_Mapping-Professional-Needs_Report.pdf (viewed 09.06.2021).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
