ART IN ACTION RESEARCH (AiAR) AND THE GLOCAL ROOTINGS OF ART: METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Keywords:Art in Action Research (AiAR), socially engaged art, global turn, philosophy of artistic research, practitioner research
This paper discusses transformative research conducted from 2016 to 2021 that aimed to establish an alternative art practitioner paradigm: Art in Action Research (AiAR). This paradigm seeks to guide methodology creation for working on and through art in socio-cultural settings while considering the global turn. The 2021 study configures four baseline discourses (BD) that are needed to perform the global turn: The first BD concerns the diversity of art and the consequences of acknowledging that all art is related to traditions and histories (thus accepting the glocal rootings of art and thus the need to integrate diverse art notions). The second BD constructs an ideal-type model of canonization. The third BD addresses artistic research as a supranational, worldwide phenomenon and shows that increased awareness of the glocal rootings of art is essential for further developing artistic research. The fourth BD discusses the literature on practitioner research across disciplines. Finally, the study derives the principles for AiAR from the four BDs and further substantiates these principles. The study performs the global turn. It introduces an alternative paradigm, AiAR, which excludes limiting, paradigmatic assumptions about art from its research base, and issues a call to elicit project-relevant understandings of art. AiAR enables creating a methodology that serves reality-oriented, setting-specific, and people-centered art practitioner research aimed at co-creating livable futures.
Albrow, M. (1996). The Global Age. Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1997). Was ist Globalisierung? Suhrkamp.
Brszyski, A. (ed.) (2007). Partisan Canons. Duke University Press.
Darian-Smith, E., McCarty, P. C. (2017). The Global Turn: Theories, Research Designs, and Methods for Global Studies. University of California Press.
Grant, M., Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, No. 26 (2), pp. 91–108. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Felshin, N. (1995). But is it Art? The Spirit of Art as Activism. Bay Press.
Ferguson, R., Gever, M., Trinh T. Minh-ha (eds.) (1990). Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures. The MIT Press.
Kent, E. (2016). Entanglement: Individual and Participatory Art Practice in Indonesia. [PhD thesis]. Australian National University. Available: https://doi.org/10.25911/5d5146060c32c (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Kivunja, C., Kuyini, A. B. (2017). Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts. International Journal of Higher Education. No. 6 (5), pp. 26–41. Available: https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n5p26 (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Lämmli, D. (2014). Art in Action: Make People Think! Reflections on Current Developments in Art. FOA-FLUX. E-article, 23 pages. Available: https://www.researchgate.net (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Lämmli, D. (2017). Artists Working Reality: Towards the Capability Approach, a Means of Evaluating Art in Action. Hong Kong Visual Arts Yearbook 2016. Department of Fine Arts, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, pp. 135–163. Available: https://dominiquelaemmli.ch/texts (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Lämmli, D. (2022). Art in Action Research (AiAR): A Methodology for Researching Socially Engaged Art from an Art Practitioner Perspective [PhD thesis]. Edocserver Humboldt University of Berlin. Available: https://doi.org/10.18452/24144 (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Mackenzie, N., Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodologies. Issues in Educational Research (IIER), No. 16. Available: http://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Martell, L. (2007). The Third Wave in Globalisation Theory. International Studies Review, No. 9 (2), pp. 173–196.
Morphy, H., Perkins, M. (2006). The Anthropology of Art: A Reflection on its History and Contemporary Practice. In: The Anthropology of Art. A Reader. Edited by H. Morphy & M. Perkins. Blackwell, pp. 1–32.
Nederveen Pieterse, J. (2013). What is Global Studies? Globalizations, No. 10 (4), pp. 499–514. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2013.806746 (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Onians, J. (2008). Introduction. In: J. Onians (ed.). The Art Atlas. Abbeville Press Publishers, pp. 10–13.
Rehbein, B. (2015). Critical Theory After the Rise of the Global South. Kaleidoscopic Dialectic. Routledge.
Rehbein, B., Schwengel, H. (2008). Theorien der Globalisierung. UVK.
Westphal, M. (1993). The Canon as Flexible, Normative Fact. The Monist, No. 76 (4), pp. 436–449. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27903354.pdf (viewed 24.10.2022.)
Copyright (c) 2023 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.