THE SYMBOLIC AND THE SEMIOTIC IN VIZMA BELŠEVICA’S POETICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol7.245Keywords:
feminist theories, poetry, poetics, Julia Kristeva, Vizma Belševica, a feminine subject, feminine languageAbstract
The article analyses Vizma Belševica’s poetic language by using the theoretical position of the French feminist Julia Kristeva who speaks about the pre-symbolic or the semiotic in language as a way of denoting what is related to rhythm, not signs. She believes that the semiotic contains a feminine code because it is related to the maternal body. The semiotic, when it is preserved in a language, causes different variations in the strict language norms, most often in a poetic text. Analysis of a number of examples reveals the specific character of Belševica’s poetics, as we follow the interaction of the symbolic and the semiotic in her poems. The semiotic or the pre-symbolic, which contains the feminine code, is not obvious in Belševica’s poetry; nevertheless it is present as it transforms the Latvian poetic tradition that used to be explicitly symbolic before. Although similar means can be observed in the poetry written by male authors and the opposition masculine/feminine is rather abstract, not marked by the sex of the author, yet in Belševica’s case the feminine means of expression: fragmentary language, dots, omissions/silence correspond to the experience uttered by a woman or a rebellious social idea, and it helps these ideas to gain a stronger influence.Downloads
References
Auziņa, A. Sievišķā valoda Vizmas Belševicas un Montas Kromas dzejā. Raksts humanitāro zinātņu žurnālam Letonica, manuskripts (pieņemts publicēšanai 2015. gada maijā).
Belševica, V. Jūra deg. Rīga: Liesma, 1966.
Belševica, V. Gadu gredzeni. Rīga: Liesma, 1969.
Belševica, V. Madarās. Rīga: Liesma, 1976.
Cixous, H., Clement, C. The Newly Born Woman. Minneapolis, Oxford: University of Minesota Press, 1987 [1975].
Ellmann, M. Thinking About Women. Eagleton, M. (ed.) Feminist Literary Theory: A Reader. Blackwell Publishers, 1996 [1986]. Pp. 295–297.
Ezergaile, I. Vizma Belševica: Sieviete un māja. Ezergaile, I. Raksti. Rīga: Zinātne, 2011.
Irigaraja, L. Kad mūsu lūpas sarunājas. Mūsdienu feministiskās teorijas. 349.–362. lpp.
Irigaray, L. Sexes and Genealogies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993 [1987].
Kristeva, J. Talking about Polylogue. Eagleton, M. (ed.): A Feminist Literary Theory: A Reader. Blackwell Publishers, 1996 [1977]. Pp. 301–303.
Kristeva, J. Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984 [1974].
Kubuliņa, A. Vizma Belševica. Rīga: Preses nams, 1997.
Meškova, S. Subjekts un teksts. Daugavpils Universitātes Akadēmiskais apgāds “Saule”, 2009.
Meškova, S. Feministiskā literatūrteorija un kritika. Virzienu, žanru un ideju modifikācijas latviešu literatūrā un literatūrkritikā. Rīga: LU LFMI, 2013.
Moi, T. I am not a woman writer. Feminist Theory. An International Interdisciplinary Journal, vol. 9(3), 2008. Pp. 259–271.
Spivaka, G. Č. Vai pakļautie spēj runāt? Rīga: Mansards, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Culture Crossroads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.