DISCURSIVE DIVERGENCES BETWEEN FILM MEDIUM AND HISTORICAL SCIENCE

Authors

  • Dr.art., Mg.hist. Dāvis Sīmanis

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55877/cc.vol7.241

Keywords:

history, narrative, film, diegesis, representation

Abstract

Representation of history is the most powerful formative factor of historical insights in society in the 20th and 21st century. Currently, there have been a number of films in production which interpret Latvian history, thus raising the profile of issues relating to the portrayal of the history of the cinema. This article conceptualises the discursive differences between historical research and historical films in order to create a basis for further studies of historical films and their adequacy for the research perspective. This article also outlines the historical features of the cinema, as well as the possibility of an alternative historical narrative: a hybridised form of a historical account created by film.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bazin, A. What is Cinema? Vol. 1, London, 1967.

Buckland, W. Film semiotics, A Companion to Film Theory. Oxford, 2004.

Deleuze, G. Cinema 1: The Movement Image. London, 1986.

Deshpande, A. Films as Historical Sources or Alternative History. Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 39, No. 40, 2004. Pp. 4455–4459.

Ferro, M. Cinema and History. Detroit, 1988.

Hughes, W. The Evaluation of Film as Evidence. The Historian and Film. Cambridge, 1976.

Hughes-Warrington, M. History Goes to the Movies. New York, 2007.

Jarvie, I. Philosophy of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology, Aesthetics. New York, 1987.

Munslow, A. (ed.). Experiments in Rethinking History. New York, 2004.

Rosenstone, R. Visions of the Past: The Challenge of Film to Our Idea of History. Cambridge, 1995.

Rosenstone, R. History on Film. Film on History. Harlow, 2006.

Sorlin, P. Mass Media. New York, 1994.

White, H. Historiography and Historiophoty. The American Historical Review, vol. 93, No. 5, 1988. Pp. 1193–1199.

Downloads

Published

14.11.2022